\n\nResults: Patients had a mean improvement of +4.7+/-8.1 letters at month 12. The mean number of needed injections was 6.8+/-1.8 (range, 3 to 9). RPE tears in fovea occurred in 8 cases (27% of all patients). Analysis of variance revealed significant upper mean values of ETDRS letters for the subgroup without RPE tears. Mean values of PED height were significant upper for RPE tears without baseline. Statistical

analysis revealed that in the subgroup without RPE tears mean values of VA significantly differed in succeeding periods compare to baseline (P<0.001). Visual improvement or stabilization was observed in 90.9% of patients without RPE tears (significant improvement of 15 or more letters www.selleckchem.com/products/pp2.html in 22.7%-5/22) and in 87.5% of patients with RPE tears (significant improvement was not observed). Baseline leakage parameters, lesion and leakage parameters at month 12 were significantly higher in patients with RPE tears. The chi-square test revealed statistically significant associations between RPE tears and subretinal fluid in OCT (P<0.05) at month 12.\n\nConclusions: In eyes with FVPED and RPE tears treated with ranibizumab, stabilization of visual acuity without significant improvement is predictable. One

of the risk factors common to RPE tears may be baseline leakage parameters and pretreatment distorted RPE contour in OCT. selleck compound During ranibizumab therapy in eyes with RPE tears, upper parameters AR-13324 of FVPED height may occur without significant differences in fovea and macula volume compare to eyes without RPE tears.”
“Identification of risk

factors of poor oncological outcome in rectal cancer surgery is of utmost importance. This study examines the impact of incidental perforation on the oncological outcome.\n\nUsing the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry, patients were selected who received major abdominal surgery for rectal cancer between 1995 and 1997 with registered incidental perforation. A control group was also selected for analysis of the oncological outcome after 5-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis was performed. Registry data were validated, and additional data were supplemented from medical records.\n\nAfter validation and exclusion of non-radically operated patients, 118 patients with incidental perforation and 155 controls in TNM stages I-III were included in the analysis. The rate of local recurrence (LR) [20% (23/118) vs. 8% (12/155) (p = 0.007)] was significantly higher among patients with perforation, whereas the rates of distant metastasis [27% (32/118) vs. 21% (33/155) (p = 0.33)] and overall recurrence (OAR) [35% (41/118) vs. 25% (38/155) (p = 0.087)] were not significantly different between the groups. Overall as well as cancer-specific 5-year survival rates were significantly reduced for the patients with perforation [44 vs. 64% (p = 0.002) and 66 vs. 80% (p = 0.026), respectively].